<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for MacBreak Tech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macbreaktech.com/old/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macbreaktech.com/old</link>
	<description>a technical discussion about all things Macintosh</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:10:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on G4 NAS Drive part 1 by G4 NAS drive MK3 :: Know Tech</title>
		<link>http://macbreaktech.com/old/55/g4-nas-drive-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-19837</link>
		<dc:creator>G4 NAS drive MK3 :: Know Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macbreaktech.com/55/g4-nas-drive-part-1/#comment-19837</guid>
		<description>[...] Mark Three is the last of version of the G4 NAS Drive project. the idea started back in the day when the readyNAS hit the scene. it was the first of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mark Three is the last of version of the G4 NAS Drive project. the idea started back in the day when the readyNAS hit the scene. it was the first of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making a Dell 1320c Color Laser print with OS X 10.4 by Dave</title>
		<link>http://macbreaktech.com/old/21/making-a-dell-1320c-color-laser-print-with-os-x-104/comment-page-1/#comment-17808</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 23:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macbreaktech.com/21/making-a-dell-1320c-color-laser-print-with-os-x-104/#comment-17808</guid>
		<description>Never mind.   Got it. Thanks for the link to the Official driver.  Worked fine on the newest Leopard.  Printer did not print initially.  Thank you to macbreaktech from last January.  Hold down the printer green button to get the printer&#039;s ip address.  It was one digit off of the address that the computer was finding on the Linksys wifi.  Now it works, through my linksys wifi, no wires.  Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never mind.   Got it. Thanks for the link to the Official driver.  Worked fine on the newest Leopard.  Printer did not print initially.  Thank you to macbreaktech from last January.  Hold down the printer green button to get the printer&#8217;s ip address.  It was one digit off of the address that the computer was finding on the Linksys wifi.  Now it works, through my linksys wifi, no wires.  Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making a Dell 1320c Color Laser print with OS X 10.4 by Dave</title>
		<link>http://macbreaktech.com/old/21/making-a-dell-1320c-color-laser-print-with-os-x-104/comment-page-1/#comment-17807</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 18:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macbreaktech.com/21/making-a-dell-1320c-color-laser-print-with-os-x-104/#comment-17807</guid>
		<description>Does this apply to a new (Sept. 2009) Mac with Leopard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this apply to a new (Sept. 2009) Mac with Leopard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making a Dell 1320c Color Laser print with OS X 10.4 by rjnleonard</title>
		<link>http://macbreaktech.com/old/21/making-a-dell-1320c-color-laser-print-with-os-x-104/comment-page-1/#comment-17461</link>
		<dc:creator>rjnleonard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macbreaktech.com/21/making-a-dell-1320c-color-laser-print-with-os-x-104/#comment-17461</guid>
		<description>I run 10.4.11. I have followed all the instructions given and have successfully downloaded the driver and it works. I selected the 250 sheet feeder after adding the new printer, as suggested, and am trying to make special setups for printing from the 1320c but it persistes in printing from the manual feed and in the print dialog box under Printer Features the option to use Auto or 250 sheet tray are grayed out and I cannot select them. Any suggestions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I run 10.4.11. I have followed all the instructions given and have successfully downloaded the driver and it works. I selected the 250 sheet feeder after adding the new printer, as suggested, and am trying to make special setups for printing from the 1320c but it persistes in printing from the manual feed and in the print dialog box under Printer Features the option to use Auto or 250 sheet tray are grayed out and I cannot select them. Any suggestions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on the underrated Airport Express by Gutenberg vs epson drivers</title>
		<link>http://macbreaktech.com/old/73/the-underrated-airport-express/comment-page-1/#comment-16775</link>
		<dc:creator>Gutenberg vs epson drivers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 04:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macbreaktech.com/?p=73#comment-16775</guid>
		<description>In my experience the Gutenberg drivers print out slightly faded. The &quot;gimp&quot; ones seem to work better with my Epson 1400. That said, it&#039;s still a far cry from the quality and control I get with the authentic Epson Drivers. Personally, I find it offensive that Apple claims this will work with &quot;any usb printer&quot; on their sales page, but happily passes your problems along to the printer manufacturers on their support page. I wouldn&#039;t be upset if they said it &quot;may not work with all printers&quot; and gave a me a list of printers it will work with.... but.... they don&#039;t. The seem to intentionally mislead us.

I&#039;m beginning to hate apple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my experience the Gutenberg drivers print out slightly faded. The &#8220;gimp&#8221; ones seem to work better with my Epson 1400. That said, it&#8217;s still a far cry from the quality and control I get with the authentic Epson Drivers. Personally, I find it offensive that Apple claims this will work with &#8220;any usb printer&#8221; on their sales page, but happily passes your problems along to the printer manufacturers on their support page. I wouldn&#8217;t be upset if they said it &#8220;may not work with all printers&#8221; and gave a me a list of printers it will work with&#8230;. but&#8230;. they don&#8217;t. The seem to intentionally mislead us.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m beginning to hate apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Working with Back to My Mac by Matt</title>
		<link>http://macbreaktech.com/old/70/working-with-back-to-my-mac/comment-page-1/#comment-16395</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macbreaktech.com/?p=70#comment-16395</guid>
		<description>Ok, so even an old router you can still forward a port... Send TCP 443 and UDP 4500, 4900 to the name or IP of the computer with back to my mac... don&#039;t see why that wouldn&#039;t work. Unless you had more than one Mac on your network using backto my mac... then ya need a newer router with NAT-PMP or UPnP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, so even an old router you can still forward a port&#8230; Send TCP 443 and UDP 4500, 4900 to the name or IP of the computer with back to my mac&#8230; don&#8217;t see why that wouldn&#8217;t work. Unless you had more than one Mac on your network using backto my mac&#8230; then ya need a newer router with NAT-PMP or UPnP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CocoaTech PathFinder as an alternative Finder by rodolfo lopez</title>
		<link>http://macbreaktech.com/old/25/cocoatech-pathfinder-as-an-alternative-finder/comment-page-1/#comment-15316</link>
		<dc:creator>rodolfo lopez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 07:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macbreaktech.com/25/cocoatech-pathfinder-as-an-alternative-finder/#comment-15316</guid>
		<description>agreed.... I really can&#039;t conceive my work session without Path Finder. My work involves file operations between many systems (that I mount with a ssh-mount, another must for me). Thanks to the shelf, the dropbox and the tabs I publish to remote servers, move files around etc etc in a way I could only dream before PF. It outstands Finder so heavily that Finder looks like a joke. And while Finder has literally no customization options, Path Finder not only delivers an absolute insane amount of them, but they are actually useful.   

Believe it or not, I haven&#039;t upgraded to Leopard, and Path Finder is pretty much the reason. The ultra-fast and tiny Tiger coupled with Path Finder leaves nothing to be desired from the fatty Leopard. 

It&#039;s funny how big companies like Apple and Microsoft patent silly stuff like scrollbars, while PF has bright ideas like the dropbox, that I won&#039;t be surprised if they get silently stolen by Apple. 

Keep up the excellent work CocoaTech guys. I am in love with your program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed&#8230;. I really can&#8217;t conceive my work session without Path Finder. My work involves file operations between many systems (that I mount with a ssh-mount, another must for me). Thanks to the shelf, the dropbox and the tabs I publish to remote servers, move files around etc etc in a way I could only dream before PF. It outstands Finder so heavily that Finder looks like a joke. And while Finder has literally no customization options, Path Finder not only delivers an absolute insane amount of them, but they are actually useful.   </p>
<p>Believe it or not, I haven&#8217;t upgraded to Leopard, and Path Finder is pretty much the reason. The ultra-fast and tiny Tiger coupled with Path Finder leaves nothing to be desired from the fatty Leopard. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny how big companies like Apple and Microsoft patent silly stuff like scrollbars, while PF has bright ideas like the dropbox, that I won&#8217;t be surprised if they get silently stolen by Apple. </p>
<p>Keep up the excellent work CocoaTech guys. I am in love with your program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 3 firmware upgrades and a squished MacBook by MacBook enthusiast</title>
		<link>http://macbreaktech.com/old/47/3-firmware-upgrades-and-a-squished-macbook/comment-page-1/#comment-15303</link>
		<dc:creator>MacBook enthusiast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 01:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macbreaktech.com/47/3-firmware-upgrades-and-a-squished-macbook/#comment-15303</guid>
		<description>Haven&#039;t read your blog in a while, it still great but to be honest your older posts were more interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t read your blog in a while, it still great but to be honest your older posts were more interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Airport Express by gamov</title>
		<link>http://macbreaktech.com/old/107/airport-express-2/comment-page-1/#comment-15097</link>
		<dc:creator>gamov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macbreaktech.com/?p=107#comment-15097</guid>
		<description>I believe that iTunes sends audio to the airport express uncompressed. Whatever format I play, the network output is constant, from ALC to ultra-compressed MP3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that iTunes sends audio to the airport express uncompressed. Whatever format I play, the network output is constant, from ALC to ultra-compressed MP3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on KnowTech.TV by macbreaktech</title>
		<link>http://macbreaktech.com/old/114/knowtechtv/comment-page-1/#comment-15090</link>
		<dc:creator>macbreaktech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macbreaktech.com/?p=114#comment-15090</guid>
		<description>sort of and not really! be sure to subscribe to the new 2.0 version of the show at Mac.KnowTech.TV</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sort of and not really! be sure to subscribe to the new 2.0 version of the show at Mac.KnowTech.TV</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.316 seconds -->
